<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lancero Review Head-To-Head: Group 1 Winner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cigarcommand.com/wp02/reviews/lancero-review-head-to-head-group-1-winner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cigarcommand.com/wp02/reviews/lancero-review-head-to-head-group-1-winner/</link>
	<description>The Latest Intel on the Cigar Wold</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 02:18:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JasonT</title>
		<link>http://www.cigarcommand.com/wp02/reviews/lancero-review-head-to-head-group-1-winner/#comment-2709</link>
		<dc:creator>JasonT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 05:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cigarcommand.com/wp02/?p=846#comment-2709</guid>
		<description>Nice pick. I&#039;ve smoke quite a few of the Nestor lanceros and I haven&#039;t had a bad experience yet. For me though, the Cubao was a little better flavor-wise. Not by much though. I like this head-to-head angle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice pick. I&#8217;ve smoke quite a few of the Nestor lanceros and I haven&#8217;t had a bad experience yet. For me though, the Cubao was a little better flavor-wise. Not by much though. I like this head-to-head angle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

