<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cigar Command &#187; Panacea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cigarcommand.com/wp02/tag/panacea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cigarcommand.com/wp02</link>
	<description>The Latest Intel on the Cigar Wold</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2011 01:20:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Cigar Review: Panacea Black Torpedo Maduro</title>
		<link>http://www.cigarcommand.com/wp02/reviews/panacea-black-torpedo-maduro/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cigarcommand.com/wp02/reviews/panacea-black-torpedo-maduro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 15:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ricky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4 Stars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maduro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Over $5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panacea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torpedo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cigarcommand.com/wp02/?p=809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, let&#8217;s kick this week off right with a cigar review.  These cigars were sent to me by Paul Bush who&#8217;s just recently created his own cigar line: Panacea.  Wanting to take what he calls an &#8220;old school&#8221; approach, Paul says his focus is on getting the best tobacco.  Instead of focusing on pretty packaging, [...]


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-811" title="Panacea Black Cigar" src="http://www.cigarcommand.com/wp02/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/panacea.jpg" alt="Panacea Black Cigar" width="400" height="92" /></p>
<p>Okay, let&#8217;s kick this week off right with a cigar review.  These cigars were sent to me by Paul Bush who&#8217;s just recently created his own cigar line: Panacea.  Wanting to take what he calls an &#8220;old school&#8221; approach, Paul says his focus is on getting the best tobacco.  Instead of focusing on pretty packaging, he wants to get back to the basics of cigar making.  Let&#8217;s see how he does.  The torpedo is 6&#215;52 and the blend is made up of a Brazilian wrapper with Cuban seed ligero and seco.</p>
<p><strong>Appearance: </strong>This is a good looking torpedo.  It has a sharp point at its cap, and the cap is well done.  The chocolate wrapper has no tooth and some slight veins with a few prominent ones.  The wrap itself is visible.  Overall, this looks like a good torpedo.  I&#8217;m not a big fan of the band itself.  It looks a little cheap to me, but I&#8217;ve said many times you can&#8217;t judge a cigar by its band.  Also, band design and production can get expensive.  If you&#8217;re putting all your money into the tobacco itself, it makes sense that the band isn&#8217;t the focus here.<br />
<span id="more-809"></span><br />
<strong>Taste: </strong>This is a pretty straight forward stick.  A mild-medium strength of a floral wood is consistent from beginning to end.  While not complex, it&#8217;s pleasant.  The strength starts out on the medium side, then mellows a bit, and picks back up toward the end.</p>
<p><strong>Aroma: </strong>Holding the foot to my schnoz, I got a little floral cinnamon in there.  The wrapper itself is a mild tobacco.</p>
<p><strong>Construction: </strong>Squeezing this stick, it&#8217;s a stout one. After clipping, the draw was fantastic.  While the burn wasn&#8217;t razor sharp, this stick was perfectly made.  The ash was firm and held tight for a long time.  I flicked the ash off the first time after I&#8217;d smoked half the cigar.  I didn&#8217;t have to flick again until I put the cigar down.  That&#8217;s a helluva well-made cigar if you ask me.</p>
<p><strong>Overall Impression: </strong>I&#8217;m impressed.  The construction of this cigar is flawless.  It burns well and the ash holds well.  I&#8217;d like a little more complexity, but I can pick out many sticks I smoke on a regular basis that aren&#8217;t complex.  At around $6 for this stick, I think it&#8217;s a great buy.</p>
<p><strong>Cigar Rating: <img class="alignnone" title="4 out of 5 stars" src="http://img172.imageshack.us/img172/1563/star4qf2.gif" alt="" width="106" height="25" /><br />
</strong></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cigarcommand.com%2Fwp02%2Freviews%2Fpanacea-black-torpedo-maduro%2F&amp;title=Cigar%20Review%3A%20Panacea%20Black%20Torpedo%20Maduro" id="wpa2a_2"><img src="http://www.cigarcommand.com/wp02/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>

<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cigarcommand.com/wp02/reviews/panacea-black-torpedo-maduro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

